Order Matters: Sequential Mechanical Shot Peening/Laser Shock Peening Engineering for A100 Steel Tailors Hydrophobicity-residual Stress Trade-offs

Guoxin Lu1, Email

Di Zhao1

Qiang Wang2

Zhong Ji

Zhong Chen3

1MOE Key Laboratory for Liquid-Solid Structural Evolution and Processing of Materials, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250061, China
2Aviation Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Corrosion and Protection for Aviation Material, AECC Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, Beijing, 100095, China
3Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huai’an, Jiangsu, 223001, China

 

Abstract

This study investigates the synergistic effects of mechanical shot peening (MSP) and laser shock peening (LSP) composite processes on the “wettability functionalization-mechanical strengthening” of A100 steel. By designing MSP-LSP (MSP followed by LSP) and LSP-MSP (LSP followed by MSP) sequences, the regulation mechanisms of hierarchical surface morphology, residual stress distribution, and wettability evolution were elucidated. Laser confocal microscopy revealed that MSP-LSP preserved periodic macro-waviness (1.25×1.25 mm2 pits) from LSP while enhancing micro-roughness (Sa=1.62±0.04 μm), achieving Cassie-Baxter state via multi-scale coupling. In contrast, LSP-MSP introduced higher residual compressive stress (-1271.93±10.92 MPa) due to secondary hardening but compromised macro-waviness integrity, resulting in lower roughness (Sa=1.50±0.08 μm) and contact angle (86.14° vs. 91.58° for MSP-LSP). Finite element simulations confirmed that process sequence governed deformation accumulation: LSP-MSP leveraged stress-gradient-driven non-uniform deformation to amplify residual stress (47.8% increase vs. single processes), while MSP-LSP optimized hierarchical structures for hydrophobicity through waviness-roughness synergy. X-ray diffraction analysis demonstrated that post-treatment dominated microstructural evolution, with LSP-MSP exhibiting higher dislocation density (FWHM=5.61° vs. 5.07° for MSP-LSP). The study establishes a process-sequence-dependent dual-performance optimization strategy: LSP-MSP prioritizes mechanical strengthening, whereas MSP-LSP enhances wettability regulation. These findings provide critical insights into tailoring composite surface engineering for aerospace materials requiring multifunctional integration.