Quantitative Process-microstructure-property Interplay in Ti60 Alloy: A Mechanistic Model for Residual Stress and Grain Refinement Gradients Induced by Impact Post-treatment

Guoxin Lu1, Email

Yuan Yao1

Jide Liu2

Guofang Zhang1, Email

Jinyan Zhong3, Email

Qiang Wang4

Kudratkhon Bakhadirov5

Ayder Nabiev6

Zhong Chen7

Jinguo Li2 

Gayrat Bahadirov6

1MOE Key Laboratory for Liquid-Solid Structural Evolution and Processing of Materials, Shandong University, Jinan, 250061, China
2Shichangxu Advanced Materials Innovation Center, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, 110016, China
3School of Materials Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China
4Aviation Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Corrosion and Protection for Aviation Material, AECC Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, Beijing, 100095, China
5Tashkent State Technical University named after I.A. Karimov, Tashkent, 100056, Uzbekistan
6Institute of Mechanics and Seismic Stability of Structures named after M. T. Urazbaev, Uzbekistan Academy of Sciences, Tashkent, 100125, Uzbekistan
7Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huai’an, 223001, China

 

Abstract

This study systematically compares the effects of laser shock peening without coating (LSPwC) and shot peening (SP) on the microstructure and mechanical properties of near-α Ti60 alloy, addressing the knowledge gap in strain-rate-dependent deformation mechanisms and residual stress gradients. Through multi-scale characterization (EBSD, XRD, FWHM), we reveal that under 0.3 mmA intensity, SP induces the finest surface grains (32.5% of base material size) and highest compressive stress (-594.8 MPa) but limited depth (~200 μm). In contrast, LSPwC at 80 mJ energy achieves deeper stress penetration (~370 μm) with stable dislocation configurations (54.8–55.1% low-angle grain boundaries) and moderate residual stress (-392.1 MPa). Both processes prioritize dislocation slip over twinning, yet SP triggers dynamic recovery with non-monotonic stress decay, while LSPwC maintains uniform grain refinement (CV=0.18) and geometrically necessary dislocation density (>15×1014/m2). These findings establish a quantitative process-microstructure-property framework, demonstrating that SP is optimal for surface-dominated hardening, whereas LSPwC-80mJ balances depth and uniformity for thick-section components in extreme environments like aerospace and deep-sea engineering.