DOI:10.30919/esee8c301

Received: 31 Jan 2019
Revised: 06 Jun 2019
Accepted: 16 Jun 2019
Published online: 19 Jun 2019

Toluene Abatement by Non-Thermal Plasma Coupled with thin Film of Cu-Co Binary Oxide Coated on Stainless Steel Mesh

Dan Yu,1 Zhenyu Tian,1,2,* Muhammad Waqas,1,2 Zhihao Jin,1,2 Achraf El Kasmi1, Dongxu Tian1,2 and Patrick Mountapmbeme Kouotou1,3

1 Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

3 National Advanced School of Engineering of Maroua, University of Maroua, P.O. Box.: 46 Maroua, Cameroon

*E-mail: tianzhenyu@iet.cn

 

Abstract

Toluene abatement has been investigated with a plasma catalytic technique without additional heating. Thin film of the Cu-Co binary oxide was coated on stainless steel mesh (SSM). The prepared Cu-Co-O/SSM was located in two annular dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) reactors. Toluene removal exhibits two-stage characteristics in the 60-mm DBD reactor. In the first stage, both full locating SSM and Cu-Co-O /SSM could equally improve the toluene removal, indicating that SSM dominates the catalytic role on toluene conversion resulting from its conductivity. In the second stage, Cu-Co-O/SSM could improve the the complete conversion of toluene, as the specific energy density is above 153 J/L by providing a reactive surface. Toluene removal exhibits one stage characteristics in the 200-mm DBD reactor. The removal efficiency and CO2 selectivity could respectively achieve 100% and 64% as the specific energy density being around 20 J/L. Partial locating SSM or Cu-Co-O/SSM could equally improve the complete toluene conversion as the specific energy density being above 8 J/L. Cu-Co-O thin film has negligible effect on toluene conversion. The gas and surface reaction mechanism has been proposed. Specific energy density and locating pattern could influence the effect of Cu-Co-O thin film coated on SSM.

Table of Content

Toluene removal was studied in a non-thermal plasma catalytic reactor at room temperature.

 

 

 

Keywords: Cu-Co-O thin film; Toluene; Non-thermal plasma; Two-stage removal; Surface reaction.


1. Introduction

As a typical component of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), toluene causes respiratory disorders, carcinogenic and mutagenic effects.1 Since it is difficult to be abated due to the presence of π-electron ring, toluene is usually selected as a probe contaminant for the treatment of VOCs. Many methods have been adopted to abate toluene. Recently, an innovative technique, named plasma-catalysis, has attracted much attention in the environmental and chemical engineering fields. Such technique integrates the advantages of quick response at room temperature from non-thermal plasma and high selectivity of desired products from catalysis.2-4 Therefore, plasma-catalysis has the prospect of application in an industrial scale.

    Lots of work has been performed on the abatement characteristics of toluene, using various catalysts. Most of them are supported metals or metal oxides.5-10 The active components were usually Ag,11 Co,10 MnOx,6, 12 CuOx,13 CoOx,12 VOx14 and etc. The supports were reported to be highly porous and thermostable materials, providing high surface area and suitable mechanical strength, such as metal oxide particles,15 activated carbons,6, 16 molecular sieves,15 honeycomb,14 sintered metal fibers,12 or conjugated polymers.17 Among these catalysts, CuO is very active for removal of exhaust gases with comparable performance to the noble metals.5, 18 It has been used in the removal of toluene and other VOCs with attractive performance.19, 20 However, CuO presents a limited stability during catalytic oxidation. It was recently reported that the introduction of Co into CuO structure could significantly improve the catalytic activity and stability of the binary oxide.8 Thus, the synthesis of Cu-Co binary oxide (Cu-Co-O) catalyst is expected to provide beneficial effect on toluene conversion using plasma. Besides improving the quality of the active component, reducing its quantity is also a key issue in the plasma catalysis research. In previous studies, weight percentage of the active component in the supported catalyst is usually larger than 3%. For example, in the study of Xu et al.,10 the weight percentage of cobalt is about 3.4% in the catalysts of Co/MCM-41. Performance of the active catalyst with small quantity is highly desirable.

    Catalyst, in the plasma zone, usually plays the catalytic effect through two ways, providing a reactive surface and modifying the plasma properties from the physical and chemical aspects.21-24 It is difficult to study the two parts separately by the experimental method, since they are coupled in the inner plasma-catalyst system. The mutual interactions between plasma and catalyst, possibly giving rise to the synergistic mechanism in the plasma-catalysis, are urgently needed to be elucidated. Till now, a large number of experimental and theoretical studies have been referred to the effect of catalyst on the plasma and vice versa.25 Nevertheless, the exact mechanisms of the catalyst effect on the toluene removal, in plasma zone, remain unclear.

    In this work, thin film of Cu-Co-O was coated on the stainless steel mesh (SSM) via pulsed-spray evaporation chemical vapor deposition (PSE-CVD) method,26, 27 which is a facile, direct and inexpensive technique to synthesize the continuous thin film catalyst with high purity. Two annular dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) reactors with different plasma length were home-designed and coupled with the prepared Cu-Co-O/SSM as the full and partial locating pattern, respectively. The characteristics of the toluene removal has been studied based on the comparison experiments between the two catalyst-locating pattern and among plasma, plasma-SSM and plasma-Cu-Co-O/SSM configurations. The interaction between catalyst and plasma has been also inferred. The mechanism in the gas phase and on the surface phase was proposed.

2. Experimental

2.1 Preparation of Cu-Co-O thin film

Cu-Co-O thin film was coated on a piece of round SSM with the diameter of 60 mm by a cold-wall stagnation point flow PSE-CVD reactor. Details of the setup and experimental procedure had been illustrated in our previous works28, 29 and only a brief description is given here. A mixture of copper acetylacetonate (Cu(acac)2) and cobalt acetylacetonate (Co(acac)2) as precursors dissolved in ethanol solutions (5 mM) was optimized with 3/7 molar ratio of Cu/Co and used as the liquid feedstock. The liquid delivery allows overcoming the inherent contrast between the sticking probabilities of different precursors in the dual-source strategy for the growth of multi-component films. The PSE delivery of the blended feedstock was achieved with a valve opening time of 1 ms and a frequency of 4 Hz. The evaporation of the injected feedstock took place at 200 °C. The resulting vapor was transported to the deposition chamber with O2 and N2 flow rates of 0.50 and 0.25 standard liter per minute (SLM) process. The SSM was. During the deposition process, the SSM, with 400 holes per square inch, was heated to 320 °C by a flat resistive heater, and the total pressure in the reactor was kept at 20 mbar. Cu-Co-O thin film was also coated on a piece of square glass with the length of a slide being 10 mm using the similar PSE-CVD method at the exactly same condition. The Cu-Co-O thin film/glass was used for the later X-ray diffraction (XRD) detection.

2.2 Characterization of Cu-Co-O thin film

    The prepared Cu-Co-O thin film were characterized by several techniques. The phase and structure of the prepared binary oxide catalyst were analyzed by XRD (Phillips X’Pert Pro MDR diffractometer with PW3830 X-ray generator, Cu Kα radiation, λ =0.154056 nm)) method. The surface morphology of the prepared catalyst before and after plasma-catalysis experiments were detected by field-emission scanning electron microscope (SEM, Hitachi S-4800) and energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS). The four-point probe method using the DC current supplier was performed to measure the conductivities of the SSM and Cu-Co-O/SSM at the room temperature and ambient pressure.

2.3 DBD reactor

    Schematic diagram of the DBD reactor is shown in Fig. 1a. The reactor is mainly composed of a quartz tube (OD=10 mm, ID=8 mm) with the length of 400 mm. A SSM, without Cu-Co-O thin film,  was rolled outside of the tube and connected to the high-voltage electrode, and a 30-mm stainless steel stick (SSS, OD=6 mm) was coaxially located inner the tube and connected to the low-voltage electrode. Two home-designed rod supports with four similar prominences, as shown in Fig. 1b, were used to keep the SSS coaxial with the silica tube and the gas passing through the tube smoothly. Distance of the discharge gap was 1 mm. Two sizes of the discharge zones, 60 and 200 mm length, were applied. The prepared Cu-Co-O/SSM was inserted into the space between the inner electrode and silica tube. Two configuration patterns, full and partial patterns, were obtained as the Cu-Co-O/SSM located in the former two DBD reactors. For the comparison study, six configurations, listed in Table 1, were used in the experiment. The DBD reactor was fed with the 6-8 kHz frequency AC power supply in the voltage range of 0-4 kV (Coronalab CTP-2000K). For the inner plasma-SSM (IPS) and inner plasma-CuCoO/SSM (IPC) configurations, the round SSM without and with thin film Cu-Co-O catalyst respectively, was rolled and put in the discharge gap.

Table 1 Six configurations used in the experiments

Configuration

Length of plasma region (mm)

Catalyst in the plasma region

P-60a

60

None

IPS-60b

60

SSM

IPC-60c

60

Cu-Co-O/SSM

P-200a

200

None

IPS-200b

200

SSM

IPC-200c

200

Cu-Co-O/SSM

Note: a the configuration of only plasma, without any SSM or Cu-Co-O/SSM in the plasma region; b the configuration of plasma-SSM, with SSM in the plasma region; c the configuration of plasma-Cu-Co-O/SSM, with Cu-Co-O thin film coated on the SSM.

2.4 Electrical diagnostics

  An electrical diagnostics system, as shown in Fig. 1c, was employed to measure the discharge power of the plasma reactor. The V-Q Lissajous figure method was adopted to determine the discharge power in the plasma reactor. A capacitor of 33 nF connected in series to the ground line of the plasma reactor was used. The high voltage applied to the plasma reactor was obtained with a 1000:1 high voltage probe (Tektronix, P6015A). The voltage across the capacitor, which was proportional to the charge Q (time-integrated current), was recorded with a 10:1 passive probe (Tektronix, TPP0101). The voltage and frequency signals were detected by a digitizing oscilloscope (Tektronix, DPO2024B).

Fig. 1 Schematic diagrams of (a) plasma-catalysis reactor, (b) transversal surface of the reactor and (c) electrical diagnostics system.

2.5 Experimental procedure

   The whole experimental setup is composed of a DBD reactor, a thin film Cu-Co-O catalyst, a power supply, an electrical signal diagnostic system, a gas supply and analysis system. The initial concentration of toluene was kept to be 231 ppm, which was obtained by controlling the flow rate of the toluene standard gas, the carrier gas argon and the oxygen flows. After passing through a mixing chamber, the feed gas entered the DBD reactor. The total gas flow rate was controlled to be 0.215 SLM, corresponding to the gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of 2,150 L·g-1·h-1. Outlet profiles of toluene, CO2 and CO were detected by absorption FTIR.8 The gaseous organic byproducts were analyzed by a GC-MS (Aglient 7890B-5977A, USA) and GC (Aglient 7890B, USA) equipped with three capillary columns (Molecular Sieve-5A, Al2O3-KCl and HP-INNOWax), TCD and FID. The specific energy density (SED), defined as discharge power/gas flow rate (J/L), was used to normalize the flowrate difference. Toluene conversion (TC) and CO2 selectivity (CS) were used to characterize the removal of toluene. TC is defined to be (Cin-Cout)/Cin, where Cin and Cout are the inlet and outlet concentration of toluene, respectively. CS is defined as the expression of CCO2/( CCO2+CCO), where CCO2 and CCO are the concentration of CO2 and CO, respectively.

 

3. Results and discussion

3.1 Characteristics of Cu-Co-O thin film

    The weight of the Cu-Co-O thin film is 3.09 mg, which is only 0.7% of that of the Cu-Co-O/SSM catalyst (441.43 mg). This weight ratio value is 21% lower than those in the previous studies.10 The thickness of the Cu-Co-O thin film is estimated to be ~160 nm. The XRD pattern of the catalyst coated on glass at 320 °C is shown in Fig. 2. The characteristic peaks of Cu-Co-O film display in excellent agreement with those of Co3O4 (JCPDS No. 74-1656) and CuO (JCPDS No. 48-1548). More importantly, no extra diffraction peaks associated with the presence of impurities or any other phases were detected. The prepared Cu-Co-O thin film was a mixture of cubic Co3O4 and CuO with high purity.  The micro-strain and crystalline size of the oxides were calculated by

ε = ß/2 cotθ                                                              (1)

and by applying the Scherrer equation

D=0.9λ/ß cosθ                                                            (2)

to the most intense diffraction peaks, respectively, where λ = 0.154056 nm and where ß and θ represent the full width at half maximum (FWHM) and diffraction angle of the observed peak. The crystal size of prepared catalyst was estimated to be 17±3 nm and micro stain ε was 0.176%±X, which is in good agreement with literature.29

     The surface morphology of the prepared catalyst before and after plasma-catalysis experiments are shown in Fig. 3. In general, smooth and evenly distributed uniform particles were observed in both cases. The particle size was estimate to be ~18 nm, which matches well with the calculated value from XRD analysis. This highly dispersed morphology with small particle size could produce more active sites to hold the adsorbed oxygen and be beneficial to the catalytic application in the plasma-catalysis system.

Fig. 2 XRD pattern of the Cu-Co-O thin film.

 

Fig. 3 SEM results of (a) the fresh Cu-Co-O thin film and (b) that after the IPC experiment.

The EDS data of the fresh thin film catalyst and that after the IPC experiment are listed in Table 2. The Co/Cu weight ratios before and after the IPC experiment are similar to be 1.26. The carbon and oxygen elements reduce much after the plasma-catalyst experiment. It means that these two atoms join the toluene removal process in the electric field.

 

Table 2 EDS results of the fresh Cu-Co-O thin film and that after the IPC experiment

Element

Wt%

Before the experiment

After the experiment

Co

18.44

41.95

Cu

14.62

32.97

O

39.34

16.55

C

27.60

8.53

3.2 Characteristics of plasma discharge

   Figure 4a, b and c show the Lissajous figures under different the input voltages of the power supply (Ui) in P-200, IPS-200 and IPC-200 configurations, respectively. The shapes of DBD Lissajous figures are approximate parallelograms. The areas of parallelogram increase with increasing of Ui, indicating that the DBD power increases with increasing of Ui. Adding SSM in the plasma region could influence the shape of parallelogram under the similar Ui, compared with P-200. The parallelogram area of IPS-200 is a little larger than that of P-200 as Ui is larger than 1.2 V. As shown in Fig. 4b, DBD power of IPS-200 is larger than that of P-200 under the similar Ui, in the range of 1.2-3.0 V. The parallelogram shape of IPC-200 (Fig. 4c) is similar to that of IPS-200. However, the parallelogram area of IPC-200 is slightly smaller than that of IPS-200 but still larger than that of P-200. In the region of 1.2-3.0 V, DBD power of IPC-200 is larger than that of P-200 but less than IPS-200 under the similar Ui. When Ui is in the range of 0-1.2 V, the DBD powers for P-200, IPS-200 and IPC-200 are similar.

Fig. 4 Lissajous figures for the discharge gap of 1 mm for the input voltages of the power supply 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 V as the length of the plasma region being 200 mm.

The Lissajous figures under Ui=2.1 V are shown in Fig. 5 in P-60, IPS-60 and IPC-60 configurations, respectively. The DBD Lissajous figures keep parallelogram shape. Adding SSM or Cu-Co-O/SSM in the plasma region could influence the shape of parallelogram. As shown in Fig. 6a, in the Ui scale of 0-1.2 V, DBD power is similar for the P-60, IPS-60 and IPC-60. As the Ui is in the scale of 1.2-2.4 V, DBD power follows the sequence of P-60>IPC-60>IPS-60. When the Ui is above 2.4 V, DBD power follows the sequence of IPC-60>IPS-6>P-60. The SED for the short plasma region is much larger than that for the longer plasma region under the similar Ui.

Fig. 5 Lissajous figures for the discharge gap of 1 mm for the input voltages of the power supply 21 V as the length of the plasma region being 60 mm.

Figure 6 shows SED vs the applied voltage, U. For the fully-locating pattern, the SED are similar for the three configurations, P-60, IPS-60 and IPC-60 as the U is below 1000 V. The SED for one condition was calculated for three times. The average one was used as the SED. The error of the SED is with 20%, because of the calculation process. The error is larger especially for the low voltage.

3.3 Fully-located pattern

    For the DBD reactor with 60-mm plasma region, round piece of SSM or Cu-Co-O/SSM with the diameter of 60 mm, could be fully located in the plasma region. Figure 7 illustrates the TC, derivatives of toluene conversion (DTC) and CS in various configurations for this DBD reactor.

 

Fig. 6 Specific energy density versus applied voltage in P, IPC and IPS configurations as the length of the plasma region being 60 and 200 mm.

Fig. 7 (a) Toluene conversions, and (b) derivatives of toluene conversion in various configurations.

As shown in Fig. 7b, DTC curves for P-60, IPS-60 and IPC-60 present two peaks, indicating that the toluene abatement process could be divided into two stages as the Ui or SED increases. In the first stage, toluene conversion firstly increases abruptly and then reaches plateau at 56%, 67% and 70% for the P-60, IPS-60 and IPC-60, respectively. In this stage, the concentration of CO2 keeps lower than that of CO, and both of them increase as the SED increases.

      The CS increases as the SED increases firstly, and then keeps stable at 26%, 31% and 35% for the P-60, IPS-60 and IPC-60, respectively, as shown in Fig. 8. In the second stage, TC restarts to increase abruptly. They could respectively achieve 79%, 91% and 100% at Ui=29 V, for the P-60, IPS-60 and IPC-60. The concentration of CO2 goes on increasing, while that of CO decreases substantially. These lead the CS to increase as large as 60%, 65% and 80% at Ui=29 V, for the P-60, IPS-60 and IPC-60, respectively. The turning points between the two stages are different for the different configurations, namely Ui=20, 18 and 15 V, corresponding to 69, 40 and 35 J/L, for the P-60, IPS-60 and IPC-60 configurations, respectively. Cu-Co-O thin film could improve the toluene conversion to the second stage at much lower SED, regardless of the introduction of SSM or not.

Fig. 8 CO2 selectivity in various configurations.

In the first stage, toluene starts to convert at 5 J/L, and achieves 50% conversion at 24 J/L in the P-60 configuration, as shown in Fig. 9. Adding SSM or Cu-Co-O/SSM in the plasma region could equally improve TC to achieve 50% conversion at 9 J/L, which is much lower than that in P-60. SSM plays a catalytic role on TC, while, Cu-Co-O thin film has negligible effect. Since SSM is a conductor, it could influence the characteristics of the plasma discharge. From Fig. 5, the Lissajous curve shows that adding SSM could change the discharge characteristics significantly. Therefore, the toluene removal for IPS-60 is improved, compared with P-60. It should be noted that the Lissajous curve of IPC-60 is quite similar to that of IPS-60. SSM could be an inner electrode in the plasma reactor due to its good conductivity. The coating of Cu-Co-O thin film could influence the conductivity of SSM. As listed in Table 3, the resistivity of Cu-Co-O/SSM is twice as that of SSM. Coating of Cu-Co-O thin film on SSM could reduce its conductivity. However, it could not change it to a dielectric material. Moreover, the Cu-Co-O film has scarce influence on the shape of the substrate due to its thickness as thin as 160 nm. Introduction of a piece of SSM, either coated or non-coated with the binary oxide, in the plasma region could equally act as an inner electrode and result in the reduction of the discharge gap dramatically. Therefore, the SSM plays a catalytic effect in this stage. Considering the CS follows the sequence of IPC-60>IPS-60>P-60 in the latter part of the first stage, Cu-Co-O thin film has an little catalytic effect on the CS, but ignorable catalytic effect on TC in the first stage.

 

Table 3 Electrical resistivities and conductivities of the SSM and Cu-Co-O/SSM

Parameters

SSM

Cu-Co-O/SSM

Resistivity (W·m)

2.240

5.670

Conductivity (1/(W·m))

0.446

0.176

 

Fig. 9 SEDs in various configurations as TC achieves 50%, 90% and 100%.

 

In the second stage, TC follows the sequence of IPC-60>IPS-60>P-60 at similar Ui. The CS in IPC-60 exhibits the largest value, while IPS-60 shows similar CS to that in P-60. Such phenomenon indicates that Cu-Co-O thin film has the definitely catalytic effect on CS and SSM plays a minor role. Compared with the result that SSM plays the main catalytic effect on the toluene conversion in the first stage, Cu-Co-O thin film plays the main catalytic effect in the second stage, no matter on the toluene conversion or the CO2 selectivity.

3.4 Partially-located pattern

     For the DBD reactor with 200-mm plasma region, one piece of round SSM or Cu-Co-O/SSM with the diameter of 60 mm, has to be partially located in the center of the plasma region. Figure 10 and 11 illustrate the TC and DTC, as well as CS in various configurations, respectively. As shown in Fig. 10b, DTC presents only one peak for P-200, IPS-200 and IPC-200, indicating that the toluene abatement process presents one-stage characteristics. It is different from the two-stage characteristics for the 60-mm DBD reactor. In P-200 configuration, toluene starts to convert at 3 J/L, and achieves 100% conversion at 8 J/L. The 50% conversion is speculated to be achieved at 4 J/L, as shown in

Fig. 10 (a) Toluene conversions and (b) derivatives of toluene conversion in various configurations with 200 mm plasma region.

Fig. 11 CSs in various configurations with 200 mm plasma region.

 

Fig. 9. In IPS-200, toluene starts to convert at 2 J/L, and achieves 50% and 100% conversion at 3 and 5 J/L, as shown in Fig. 9, respectively. TC profile in the IPC-200 configuration is similar to that in the IPS-200, which demonstrates that the SSM addition benefits for toluene conversion instead of Cu-Co-O film. In the 200-mm-plasma-region DBD reactor, the concentration of CO2 keeps larger than that of CO for all the 200-mm plasma region configurations. CS keeps 64% as the SED increases, till the toluene consumes completely, as shown in Fig. 12. SSM and Cu-Co-O thin film have little effect on the CO2 selectivity when the SED is less than 18 J/L. As the SED is larger than 18 J/L, the concentrations of CO2 and CO in IPC-200 are more than those in IPS-200. The CO2 selectivity increases slightly. The Cu-Co-O thin film starts to act as a catalyst.

Fig. 12 CSs in various configurations as the toluene conversion achieve 50%, 90% and 100%.

3.5 Proposed mechanism

    The intermediates produced during the removal of toluene were listed in table 4. Since the inlet toluene concentration was as low as 231 ppm, the mole fractions of the intermediates were too low to be quantified by the GC or GC-MS with the detection limit of several ppm. It is difficult to get the rule from the mole fraction data of the intermediates. But it did not inhibit the speculation of the toluene removal mechanism.

Table 4 The intermediates detected in the experiment

No.

Name

Molecular formula

Molecular structure

1

Methane

CH4

2

Ethanal

C2H4O

3

1,3-butadiene

C4H6

4

Acetone

C3H6O

5

Isopropanol

C3H8O

6

Benzaldehyde

C7H6O

7

Acetophenone

C8H8O

8

Phenol

C6H6O

9

P-methylphenol

C7H8O

10

M-isopropylphenol

C8H12O

11

Phenylpropane

C9H12

12

Biphenyl

C12H10

13

Bibenzyl

C14H14

14

Naphthalene

C10H8

15

Methylnaphthalene

C11H10

16

Indene

C9H8

17

Benzofuran

C8H6O

18

Hydrogenated

benzofuran

C8H8O

 

     Figure 13 shows the mechanism of toluene removal in the DBD reactor coupled with binary oxide thin film. As the SED is lower than 20 J/L, plasma discharge plays the main role for the abatement of toluene. The mechanism is dominated by the gas phase reactions. SSM addition could influence the plasma discharge characteristics in the reactor by reducing the effective discharge gap. The Cu-Co-O thin film does not change the conductive property of SSM definitely. Therefore, toluene conversion and CO2 selectivity in the two configurations are similar. The concentrations of CO and CO2 would equally increase as that of the active oxygen increases resulting from the SED increases. As the discharge power becomes larger, concentrations of active oxygen and active hydrocarbon pieces tend to increase. The concentrations of CO and CO2 would be increased much. More active oxygen results in the production of CO2 from CO. The CO2 selectivity increases. SSM could change the dischargeplay characteristics to enhance the toluene removal. Since the Cu-Co-O film could provide the catalytic surface, and the lattice oxygen atom would be activated to join the surface reaction, the abatement of toluene could be improved by Cu-Co-O film.

3.6 Comparison

3.6.1 Fully- and partially-located pattern

    Compared the toluene conversion between fully- and partially-located pattern, the TC could achieve 100% at much lower Ui, i.e. SED. Longer plasma region leads to higher toluene conversion at the similar SED. In the 60-mm-plasma-region DBD reactor, the CS was about 30%. While CSs in P-200, IPS-200 and IPC-200 are similar to be 64%. Longer plasma region leads to larger CS as well. Since the length of the catalyst is similar no matter for the fully or partially catalyst located pattern,

Fig. 13 Proposed mechanism of the gas (upper) and surface (bottom) reaction.

the difference of toluene conversion characteristics between the two kinds of configurations mainly results from the different length of the plasma region. The flowrate of the mixed gas keeps similar for the different configuration. Therefore, the residence times of the toluene and O2 are decided by the plasma region length. For P-200 and P-60 configurations, the residence times are 1.23 and 0.37 s, respectively. Longer residence time, means the longer decomposition and reaction times in the plasma region, which brings the more exhaustive chemical reaction of the active species. Increasing the length of the plasma region benefits to the toluene removal for the plasma-catalyst system.

     As shown in Fig. 12, the CSs are similar in P-200, IPS-200 and IPC-200 as the toluene conversion achieves 50%, 90% and 100%, respectively. It means that adding SSM or Cu-Co-O/SSM in the middle of the plasma region has no effect on the CO2 selectivity. Neglecting the heterogeneous reactions on the silica and SSS surface, in the only plasma configuration, CO and CO2 are mainly produced from the chemical reactions in the gas phase. In the IPS and IPC configurations, CO and CO2 are mainly produced through two ways: reactions in gas phase and heterogeneous reactions on the surface of SSM or Cu-Co-O thin film. The plasma discharge in the similar reactor has no selectivity effect on the production of COx. However, surface of the catalyst could provide the absorption site for the production of CO2 from CO. The similarity of the CO2 selectivity in the three configurations indicated that surface of SSM and Cu-Co-O thin film/SSM has no effect on the CO2 selectivity. As the input voltage of the power is in the scale of 0-10 V, Cu-Co-O thin film has no effect on the abatement of toluene. Improvement induced by adding SSM results from the influence on the characteristics of the plasma discharge by reducing the discharge gap. As the input voltage of the power increases above 20 V, the CS increase as well. The Cu-Co-O thin film starts to be like a catalyst. The reason might be that the concentrations of active hydrocarbon species and oxygen increase as the discharge power increases. The absorption of oxygen group are enhanced and the CO reacting with oxygen to produce CO2 are improved.

3.6.2 The present and previous work

    As listed in Table 5, compared with the previous work, the SEDs in IPC-60 and IPC-200 are 67 and 4 J/L as the toluene conversion is 80%. The SEDs in IPC-60 and IPC-200 are 152 and 20 J/L as the CO2 selectivity is 80%. These are much lower than those in the previous studies for the IPC configurations. The quantity of the active component in this work is about 3.09 mg, which is less than that in the previous studies. The lower SED and less active component means the better characteristics of the plasma-catalysis reactor in the present work. The shorter discharge gap and the high purity of the metal oxide crystals might be the main reason.

 

Table 5 Comparison between this work and previous work

Catalyst

Support

Active component

Quantity of the catalyst

Percentage of the active component (wt%)

Plasma

Residence time

SED (80% toluene conversion, J/L)

SED (80% CO2 selectivity)

Ref.

60Co-MCM-41

Molecular sieve

Co

100 mg

3.39

IPC

---

135

260

[10]

60Co-MCM-41_imp

Molecular sieve

Co

100 mg

3.45

IPC

---

162

N.A. a

[10]

CuO-MnO2/TiO2

TiO2 pellet

CuO, MnO2

10 g

9.8

PPC

0.25 s

2

---

[13]

CuO-MnO2/TiO2

TiO2 pellet

CuO, MnO2

10 g

9.8

IPC

1.12 s

N.A.

---

[13]

MnOx/Al2O3/nickel foam

Al2O3/nickel foam

MnOx

15 cm3

30a

IPC

0.02 sb

255

< 250

[30, 31]

FeOx/Al2O3/nickel foam

Al2O3/nickel foam

FeOx

15 cm3

---

IPC

0.02 sb

240

< 195

[30]

CoOx/Al2O3/nickel foam

Al2O3/nickel foam

CoOx

15 cm3

---

DBD

0.02 sb

278

< 175

[30]

CuO/Al2O3/nickel foam

Al2O3/nickel foam

CuO

15 cm3

---

DBD

0.02 sb

268

< 155

[30]

Cu-Co-O/SSM

SSM

Cu-Co-O

0.44 g

0.7

IPC-60 mm

0.37 s

67

152

This work

Cu-Co-O/SSM

SSM

Cu-Co-O

0.44g

0.7

IPC-200 mm

1.23 s

4

20

This work

Note: aN.A. means not achieved; bcalculated by the ratio in Ref 31; ccalculated by the 150 mm effective length in Ref. 31 divided by the 450m/min gas flow rate in Ref. 30;

4. Conclusion

This work reports the effect of Cu-Co oxide thin film, coated on stainless steel mesh, on the conversion of toluene in the non-thermal plasma reactor without additional heating. Six configurations, P-60, IPS-60, IPC-60, P-200, IPS-200 and IPC-200, have been used for the comparison studies. Two-stage abatement exits as the discharge power increases for the fully-located pattern. SSM plays the main catalytic role by acting an electrode in the first stage, while the Cu-Co-O thin film joins the catalytic activity by providing a reactive surface in the second stage. For the partially-located pattern, one-stage abatement exits as the discharge power increases. SSM addition, with or without Cu-Co-O thin film, in the center of the plasma region, could equally improve the toluene conversion. SSM play the main catalytic role but Cu-Co-O thin film has little effect on the toluene conversion. Therefore, the toluene removal is a gas reaction converting to surface reaction process. Specific energy density and locating pattern would influence the effect of Cu-Co-O thin film coated on SSM. This work is meaningful to the employment of binary oxide thin film with high efficiency on the conversion of toluene for practical industrial application.

Acknowledgment

This work was mainly funded by the the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2017YFA0402800), National Key R&D Program of China, Innovation Guidance foundation of Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Recruitment Program of Global Youth Experts. MW acknowledges the support of CAS-TWAS Presidents’ Fellowship. AEK is grateful for the support of Chinese Academy of Sciences for senior international scientists within the framework of PIFI program.


References

1. A. L. Bolden, C. F. Kwiatkowski and T. Colborn, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2015, 49, 11984-11989.

2. Z. Bo, H. Hao, S. Yang, J. Zhu, J. Yan and K. Cen, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 436, 570-578.

3. J. Wu, Q. Xia, H. Wang and Z. Li, Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2014, 156, 265-272.

4. A. M. Vandenbroucke, R. Morent, N. De Geyter and C. Leys, J. Adv. Oxid. Technol., 2012, 15, 232-241.

5. M. Ferrandon, J. Carno, S. Jaras and E. Bjornbom, Appl. Catal. A Gen., 1999, 180,153-161.

6. S. Delagrange, L. Pinard and J. M. Tatibouet, Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2006, 68, 92-98.

7. Y. F. Guo, D. Q. Ye, K. F. Chen and J. C. He, Catal. Today, 2007, 126, 328-337.

8. Z.Y. Tian, P. H. T. Ngamou, V. Vannier, K. Kohse-Hoinghaus and N. Bahlawane, Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2012, 117, 125-134.

9. B. Wang, C. Chi, M. Xu, C. Wang and D. Meng, Chem. Eng. J., 2017, 322, 679-692.

10. X. Xu, J. Wu, W. Xu, M. He, M. Fu, L. Chen, A. Zhu and D. Ye, Catal. Today, 2017, 281, 527-533.

11. H. H. Kim, A. Ogata and S. Futamura, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 2005, 38, 1292-1300.

12. C. Subrahmanyam, A. Magureanu, A. Renken and L. Kiwi-Minsker, Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2006, 65, 150-156.

13. J. Van Durme, J. Dewulf, W. Sysmans, C. Leys and H. Van Langenhove, Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2007, 74, 161-169.

14. J. O. Chae, V. Demidiouk, M. Yeulash, I. C. Choi and T. G. Jung, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 2004, 32, 493-497.

15. R. Zhu, Y. Mao and L. Jiang, J. Chen, Chem. Eng. J., 2015, 279, 463-471.

16. C. He, L. Cao, X. Liu, W. Fu and J. Zhao, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 2015, 12, 3531-3540.

17. M. J. Garcia-Fernandez, M. M. Pastor-Blas, F. Epron and A. Sepúlveda-Escribano, Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2018, 225, 162-171.

18. Y. Feng, P. M. Rao, D. R. Kim and X. Zheng, Proc. Combust. Inst., 2011, 33, 3169-3175.

19. M. F. Zheng, D. Q. Yu, L. J. Duan, W. H. Yu and L. Huang, Catal. Commun., 2017, 100, 187-190.

20. L. Mohammadi, E. Bazrafshan, M. Noroozifar, A. Ansari-Moghaddam, F. Barahuie and D. Balarak, J. Chem., 2017, 2017, 2069519.

21. E. C. Neyts and A. Bogaerts, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 2014, 47, 224010

22. W. Wang, H. H. Kim, K. Van Laer and A. Bogaerts, Chem. Eng. J., 2018, 334, 2467-2479.

23. W. Somers, A. Bogaerts, A. C. T. van Duin and E. C. Neyts, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012, 116, 20958-20965.

24. Y. R. Zhang, K. Van Laer, E. C. Neyts, A. Bogaerts, Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2016, 185, 56-67.

25. H. L. Chen, H. M. Lee, S. H. Chen, M. B. Chang, S. J. Yu and S. N. Li, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2009, 43, 2216-2227.

26. S. B. Ay and N. K. Perkgoz, J. Nanomater., 2015, 2015, 257547.

27. D.W. Lee and B. R. Yoo, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2014, 20, 3947-3959.

28. P. M. Kouotou, Z. Y. Tian, H. Vieker, A. Beyer, A. Goelzhaeuser and K. Köhse-Hoeinghaus, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1, 10495-10504.

29. G. F. Pan, S. B. Fan, J. Liang, Y. X. Liu and Z. Y. Tian, Rsc Adv., 2015, 5,42477-42481.

30. Y. Guo, X. Liao, M. Fu, H. Huang and D. Ye, J. Environ. Sci., 2015, 28, 187-194.

31. Y. F. Guo, D. Q. Ye, K. F. Chen, J. C. He and W. L. Chen, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2006, 245, 93-100.